Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a score of 82, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 overall score. Although Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is notably older and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 50, it's body is still notably lighter. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712, a way brighter display, a little bigger display and a little greater pixel density. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 features just a bit more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a lot lower 50 mega pixels resolution back camera, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot bigger sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 and Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only both have really similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.