Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus, with a general score of 82 against 79.7. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is a newer device, and it is also a little bit thinner and lighter than the Moto G Stylus. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only and Moto G Stylus both feature extremely similar processing units, both have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy A32 LTE Only features just a bit better looking display than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a little bit higher number of pixels per display inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Moto G Stylus shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low-light situations, a way better (4K) video resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The Moto G Stylus has just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has better battery duration than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.