Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a global score of 82, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only is an extremely older and way thicker device than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it notably lighter anyway. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has a much better 2200 x 2480 resolution, a just a bit greater display pixel density, a lot brighter display and a bigger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a really superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a much less MP camera, it also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.