Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-25 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.31 ounces |
| Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a global score of 82, which is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro's global score of 78.8. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS. Even though the Galaxy A32 LTE Only and vivo X60 Pro were released only a few months apart, the Galaxy A32 LTE Only construction is notably lighter but just a bit thicker.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features just a bit better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit higher pixels density.
The vivo X60 Pro features a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only, because although it has a much less MP resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot better video quality and a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has longer battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.