Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android | Android 12 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2022-09-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.43 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Space Gray |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2448 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate's score of 83.2. The Samsung Galaxy A32 design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, despite of the fact that it was released a little bit over a year before. The Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, and Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has Android 12 operating system.
Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a better quantity of pixels per screen inch, a little bit larger display and a lot better 1080 x 2448 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a way better processing power than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a camera with a higher resolution and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.