Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2024-03-14 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.90 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Desert Sand, Eternal Black, Misty Grey and Skyline Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is better than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra's 76.1 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, and Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra works with Android 14 OS. The Samsung Galaxy A32 body is a bit lighter than the Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, although it's a bit thicker and was released 3 years before.
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra counts with a lot better screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a quite bigger screen, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and more pixels per screen inch. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra counts with a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much better performance than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a 5500mAh battery size against 5000mAh. The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, it also counts with a higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.