Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-01-17 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | S-LCD 3 |
| 270 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is better than HTC U11 EYEs, with a score of 84.7 against 76.9. Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, while HTC U11 EYEs comes with Android, HTC Sense UI OS. The Samsung Galaxy A32 construction is extremely newer, but just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than the HTC U11 EYEs.
Galaxy A32 counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC U11 EYEs. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. HTC U11 EYEs counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better 1080 x 2160px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels. HTC U11 EYEs has more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have equal internal storage, the HTC U11 EYEs also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A32 counts with improved battery lifetime than HTC U11 EYEs, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.