Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black and Gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is much better than the LG G7 Fit's overall score of 77. The Galaxy A32 is a notably newer device than the LG G7 Fit, but it is somewhat thicker and much heavier. Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, and LG G7 Fit counts with Android 8.1 Oreo operating system.
LG G7 Fit counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per screen inch and a way higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with slightly more storage to store more apps and games than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a bit faster processing unit than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has more CPU cores. Galaxy A32 takes much clearer videos and photos than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light situations and a much more mega pixels back camera.
The Galaxy A32 features a way better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.