Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is a bit better than the LG G7 ThinQ's 81 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 body is noticeably newer than the LG G7 ThinQ's, but it is thicker and way heavier. Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, and LG G7 ThinQ works with Android 9.0 Pie OS.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater display density and a way higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG G7 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A32 takes slightly better photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy A32 features a very superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.