Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aurora black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ, having an 84.7 score against 82.7. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, and LG G8X ThinQ works with Android 10 OS. Even though Galaxy A32 is newer than LG G8X ThinQ, it's just a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker. LG G8X ThinQ features a sharper display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A32, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features better battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Galaxy A32 has a little bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.