Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Blue, Red and White |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is better than LG K52, getting an 84.7 score against 76. The Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, and LG K52 has Android 10 operating system. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, the Galaxy A32 design is just a bit thicker and a little heavier than the LG K52.
LG K52 has a little better performance than Galaxy A32. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. LG K52 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same 720 x 1600 resolution, the LG K52 also counts with a quite larger screen.
The LG K52 counts with more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A32, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG K52 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has better battery performance than LG K52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A32 takes a bit better videos and photos than LG K52, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and a same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.