Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is a bit better than the LG V10, having a global score of 84.7 against 78.6. The Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, while LG V10 has Android 5.1 OS. Even though Galaxy A32 is notably newer than LG V10, it's just a little thicker and a little heavier. The Galaxy A32 features a bit better CPU than LG V10, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy A32 also has 7 more cores.
LG V10 has an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a way higher display pixel density. The LG V10 has a bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V10 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A32 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than LG V10, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera. The Galaxy A32 features a much longer battery life than LG V10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.