Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a bit better than Galaxy A32's general score of 84.7. LG Velvet's construction is thinner and lighter than Galaxy A32, even though they were released with only 8 months difference. The LG Velvet has a better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a little bigger screen, a higher pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
The LG Velvet has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG Velvet takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A32. They have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same diafragm aperture.
The LG Velvet counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A32, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with superior battery life than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.