Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is slightly better than Galaxy A32's 84.7 general score. Motorola edge's body is a little thicker but just a little bit lighter than Galaxy A32, and they were released with only a couple of months difference. The Motorola edge works with Android 10 OS, and Galaxy A32 works with Android OS.
Motorola edge has a brighter display than Galaxy A32, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a better pixel density and a bit larger display. Motorola edge features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola edge also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola edge counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A32 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Motorola edge has a much better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same camera aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola edge also has a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.