Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a score of 92.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A32's 84.7 score. Motorola Edge 20 Pro comes with Android 12 OS, while Galaxy A32 works with Android OS. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's body is a bit lighter and thinner than the Galaxy A32, although both were released with only a couple of months difference.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a higher screen pixel density, a bit bigger screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much more MP back camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy A32 has just a bit better battery life than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.