Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 13 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's 77 score. Despite being the best phone we are comparing here, we must highlight that it's also an a lot older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier phone. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS, and Motorola Edge 40 Neo works with Android 13 OS.
Galaxy A32 features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a better pixel count per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a more MP camera. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a battery duration that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A32 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.