Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 13 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Interstellar Black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a global score of 84.7 against 83.4. The Galaxy A32 has Android OS, and Motorola Edge 40 Pro comes with Android 13 OS. Although it's the best we are comparing, we must tell that it is also extremely older, just a little heavier and a little thicker.
Galaxy A32 has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a little bit larger display, a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a lot higher video quality and a camera in the back with more megapixels. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has just a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy A32 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.