Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a overall score of 84.7 against 81.9. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 OS. The Galaxy A32 design is notably older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
The Galaxy A32 features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better pixel density and a much higher 1256 x 2760px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.