Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy A32, getting an 86.3 score against 84.7. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy A32. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 OS, and Galaxy A32 has Android OS.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A32, because it has a better amount of pixels per screen inch, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way larger aperture to take better low light captures and a camera in the back with a better resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.