Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy A32, having a general score of 87.1 against 84.7. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is notably newer, a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Galaxy A32. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra works with Android 14 operating system, and Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system.
The Galaxy A32 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a bit bigger screen and a greater count of pixels per display inch.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a more MP camera, a larger aperture for better low light images and video and faster video frame rates. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.