Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2018-04-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Blue and Gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is slightly better than the Moto G6 Plus, with a global score of 84.7 against 77.5. Galaxy A32 is a noticeably newer device than the Moto G6 Plus, although it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola Moto G6 Plus has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto G6 Plus also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Moto G6 Plus features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a way better 1080 x 2160 resolution. The Galaxy A32 captures much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
The Galaxy A32 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy A32 has a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G6 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.