Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Blue and Brown |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Vision's global score of 80.7. Although the Galaxy A32 is newer than the Motorola One Vision, it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. Motorola One Vision counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Motorola One Vision features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a much better pixels number per inch of display. Motorola One Vision has a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola One Vision counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy A32 features a superior battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.