Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is a bit better than the Nokia XR20's 80.8 overall score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A32 and the Nokia XR20 were only released 6 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy A32 is lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while Nokia XR20 comes with Android 11 OS.
The Nokia XR20 has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Nokia XR20 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Nokia XR20 has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a lot higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little larger screen and more pixels per screen inch.
Nokia XR20 and Galaxy A32 both have extremely similar cameras, and although the Nokia XR20 has higher 60 fps video frame rate, they both have a same size aperture, the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same resolution back camera. The Nokia XR20 features a little bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A32 has a bit superior battery performance than Nokia XR20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4630mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.