Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Cyber shade |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. The Galaxy A32 construction is newer, a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while nubia Red Magic 3S comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a higher pixel amount in each inch of display, a little larger screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Nubia Red Magic 3S takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 mega-pixels, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way higher video definition and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S's battery life is very similar to Galaxy A32's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.