Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Sonic silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a overall score of 84.7 against 76.2. Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, while nubia Red Magic 5S works with Android 10 operating system. Even when Galaxy A32 and nubia Red Magic 5S were only released 5 months apart, Galaxy A32 is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a brighter screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a higher screen density, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite bigger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 5S takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a much better video resolution and a back camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features just a bit longer battery performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.