Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Ocean |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting a general score of 84.7 against 83.1. Samsung Galaxy A32's design is just a little bit thicker but a little bit lighter than OPPO Find X2 Pro, and both of them were only released with a few months difference. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, and OPPO Find X2 Pro works with Android 10 OS.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A32, because it has a much better 1440 x 3168 resolution, way more pixels per inch of screen and a little bit larger screen.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same resolution back-facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and videos and higher video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features superior battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 17% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.