Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A40, with a general score of 84.7 against 79.6. Even though the Galaxy A32 is newer than Samsung Galaxy A40, it's somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier. Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, and Samsung Galaxy A40 comes with Android 11 operating system.
Galaxy A32 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A40. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A40 features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a way greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A40, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The Galaxy A32 counts with a bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A40, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.