Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is a bit better than Galaxy A50, with a general score of 84.7 against 83.8. Samsung Galaxy A32's body is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Galaxy A50. Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a lot higher 1080 x 2340px resolution. Galaxy A32 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
The Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.