Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A32's score of 84.7. Even though Galaxy A52 and the Galaxy A32 were released with only 2 months difference, Galaxy A52 is just a little lighter and a bit thinner. The Galaxy A52 has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 counts with a much better display than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy A52 also has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher pixel density. Galaxy A52 features a superior camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also has a camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52 has a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB, the Galaxy A52 also has 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A32 has just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.