Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a little bit better than Galaxy A32, having a overall score of 91.3 against 84.7. Although Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Galaxy A32 were released only a couple of months apart, Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 OS, while Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a sharper screen than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more pixels per display inch and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A32 features a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video definition, the same camera aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.