Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Galaxy A32, with a 97.6 score against 84.7. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold is older and a lot heavier than the Galaxy A32, it's body is still way thinner. Samsung Galaxy Fold has Android 9.0 Pie operating system, while Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM. The Galaxy Fold features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen, a quite bigger screen and a much higher resolution of 1536 x 2152.
The Galaxy Fold features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A32 features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy A32 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.