Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 12 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2022-04-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | -- |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G's 76.7 general score. Even being the best phone in this comparison, we must highlight that it is also older, heavier and somewhat thicker. Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, and Samsung Galaxy M53 5G counts with Android 12 OS.
Galaxy M53 5G has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a better pixels density and a bit larger screen. The Galaxy A32 counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A32 captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy M53 5G, although it has a way less megapixels back facing camera, they both have the same camera aperture.
Galaxy M53 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as Galaxy A32's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.