Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A32's general score of 84.7. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is a little bit heavier but somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy A32, and both of them were released with only 5 months difference. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra comes with Android 13 OS, while Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A32, because it has a quite bigger screen, a lot greater display pixel density and a lot better 1440 x 3088 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a way more MP camera.
The Galaxy A32 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.