Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A32, getting an 89.7 score against 84.7. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's design is thinner and just a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy A32, although it was released around 12 months before. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a brighter display than Galaxy A32, because it has a better display pixels density, a little larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a better storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD card slot that allows 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.