Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Galaxy A32, with a 95.4 score against 84.7. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has Android 13 operating system, while Galaxy A32 has Android operating system. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer and just a bit thinner, but heavier than Galaxy A32.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra features an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a little bit bigger display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a way higher pixels quantity per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A32 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra and Galaxy A32 have similar batteries performance.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.