Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 84.7 score against 81. Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, while Galaxy XCover Pro comes with Android 11 operating system. Galaxy A32's design is newer, a little lighter and just a little thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better performance than Galaxy A32. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher pixel amount per inch of screen and a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a much better (4K) video quality. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.