Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the Galaxy A32, with a score of 88.5 against 84.7. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip works with Android 12 OS, and Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is older than the Galaxy A32, it's construction is noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a bit bigger screen and a much better pixel quantity per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy A32 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.