Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a bit better than the Galaxy A32, having a 92.3 score against 84.7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is way thinner and lighter than the Galaxy A32, although both of them were released only 6 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G comes with Android 11 OS, while Galaxy A32 works with Android OS.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a brighter screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a lot more pixels per display inch, a little bit larger display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2636px. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A32 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a slightly better storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A32 features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.