Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is better than Galaxy A32's score of 84.7. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with Android 11 OS, and Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the Galaxy A32 were released with only 4 months difference, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is incredibly heavier but a lot thinner.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a higher screen density, a way higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a larger display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A32 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy A32 has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.