Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 94.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-01-26 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 2500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia PRO is better than Galaxy A32, with a global score of 94.3 against 84.7. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, Sony Xperia PRO is a somewhat thicker and a bit heavier phone than Galaxy A32. The Sony Xperia PRO counts with Android 10 operating system, while Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system.
Xperia PRO features a much sharper display than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xperia PRO also has a much better resolution of 1644 x 3840px and a much greater display density. Sony Xperia PRO counts with a superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB, the Sony Xperia PRO also has more internal memory.
The Sony Xperia PRO has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Sony Xperia PRO also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A32 has a little bit better camera than Xperia PRO, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with greater battery duration than Xperia PRO, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.