Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | -- |
| 2021-01-22 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Xperia XZ Premium's global score of 79.8. The Galaxy A32 is a a lot newer phone than Xperia XZ Premium, although it is somewhat thicker and a bit heavier. Xperia XZ Premium has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ Premium has a lot better screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2160 x 3840 and a much higher pixel count per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 features a really longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A32 has a little bit better camera than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.