Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2015-09-02 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.43 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 409.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 430 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 520 hours standby time 13.2 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than the Xperia Z5's 77.6 general score. Galaxy A32's body is much newer than the Xperia Z5's, but it's way heavier and thicker. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while Xperia Z5 counts with Android 5.1 operating system.
Xperia Z5 has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xperia Z5 also counts with a graphics processing unit. Xperia Z5 counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much greater screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia Z5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Xperia Z5, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A32 features a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia Z5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.