Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro's 82.9 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, and Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro comes with Android 9.0 Pie OS. The Samsung Galaxy A32 design weights the same than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, but it's a bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a brighter screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a higher screen density.
Galaxy A32 has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 features greater battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.