Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A32, having a overall score of 86.6 against 84.7. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has Android 10 operating system, and Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system. Even being the best we are comparing here, Xiaomi Black Shark 3's construction is somewhat thicker and a little heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A32.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a little bit larger display, a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a much better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a camera in the back with much more mega pixels and better video frame rates. Galaxy A32 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 features a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4720mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.