Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-05-06 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Mirror Black and Pale Grey |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | $ 499.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a global score of 88.3, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A32's global score of 84.7. Although the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A32, we must highlight that it is also a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 works with Android 11 operating system, and Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Black Shark 4 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bigger display and a better pixel amount per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 4 takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same resolution back camera, the Xiaomi Black Shark 4 also has higher video frame rate. The Galaxy A32 features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.