Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-01-22 | -- |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | 16 777 216 |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3350mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite's general score of 77.7. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite comes with Android 8.1 Oreo OS. The Galaxy A32 is a heavier and thicker device than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite.
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2280. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a really longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, because it has a 49 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.