Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9T, with a overall score of 84.7 against 82.2. Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 OS. Samsung Galaxy A32 is a newer device than Xiaomi Mi 9T, but it is just a bit heavier and a bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution. Xiaomi Mi 9T features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a bit better camera than Galaxy A32. Both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a F1.8 camera aperture, the same resolution back facing camera and the same 30 fps video frame rates. The Galaxy A32 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 counts with superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.