Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, getting an 84.7 score against 82.7. Even though Samsung Galaxy A32 is newer than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, it is just a bit heavier and a bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS, while Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with Android 10 OS.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same diafragm aperture and a back camera with a 48 mega pixels, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has faster video frame rates.
Galaxy A32 counts with greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.