Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, having a global score of 84.7 against 83.4. Galaxy A32 is a just a bit lighter and a bit thinner phone than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, although they were only released 2 months apart. Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, while Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with Android 11 operating system.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a little bigger display, a higher amount of pixels per display inch and a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a bit better processor than Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A32, because it has a 5160mAh battery size. Galaxy A32 features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro. They have a 48 megapixels camera in the back, the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.