Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2021-05-26 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, having a overall score of 84.7 against 79.5. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, we must highlight that it's also a a little bit thicker and a little heavier device. Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with Android 11 operating system.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features a sharper display than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G also has a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features a little better performance than Galaxy A32. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 captures better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G. They have a camera in the back with a 48 MP resolution and a same size diafragm aperture.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G and Galaxy A32 count with extremely similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.